Chapter 8 - Travis Blamed Natalie for “Going Soft”
Travis had expected Natalie to fight harder.
At mediation she did initially.
Then outside counsel showed:
email warnings,
valuation problems,
proxy conflicts.
Natalie stopped calling it:
Claire’s choice.
She said:
“I should have gotten her signature.”
Travis became furious.
“You're handing her the company.”
“No.”
“We put in the money.”
“We're getting it back.”
“That isn't the point.”
There.
The point was:
ownership.
Travis wanted:
control.
Then their marriage history surfaced.
When Travis met Natalie, Forge House was:
one leased room,
twelve regular clients.
Natalie helped:
branding,
scheduling,
books.
Travis helped:
Bennett Field programming.
They built things together.
He admired Natalie when she:
decided quickly,
stopped asking family permission.
Then her resentment toward Claire became:
shared project.
Travis said:
“Your sister gets to disappear and still own everything.”
Natalie said:
“She earned part of it.”
Then later:
“But yeah.”
Travis turned:
hurt
into:
economic theory.
Presence should equal ownership.
Then after audit, Natalie began questioning:
how much of her judgment had been hers.
Travis hated that.
“You're letting Claire make you feel guilty.”
Natalie answered:
“I signed for her while benefiting.”
“You had authority.”
“I had a conflict.”
Then:
“You sound like the lawyers.”
“Maybe the lawyers are right.”
That conversation changed them.
Then backyard incident.
Natalie had watched:
Travis throw gloves,
mock Sophie,
advance on Claire.
Later Travis said:
“I never touched the kid.”
Natalie answered:
“You wanted her scared.”
“She needed to see Claire isn't some superhero.”
Natalie stared.
“Why?”
Travis had no good answer.
He resented Claire’s military identity.
But humiliating her to an eleven-year-old had nothing to do with business fairness.
It was cruelty.
Then Natalie asked:
“Would you have hit Claire?”
“No.”
“Then why the gloves?”
“Because she thinks she's better than me.”
Again:
status.
Then Sophie.
Natalie visited Claire without Travis.
Sophie stayed upstairs at first.
Natalie said:
“She doesn't have to see me.”
Good.
Then Sophie came down.
Natalie apologized:
“I should have stopped Travis when he talked to you that way.”
Sophie asked:
“Why didn't you?”
Natalie looked at Claire.
Claire said nothing.
Natalie answered:
“Because I was angry at your mom and I let that make me ignore something wrong.”
Good.
No adult financial explanation.
Then Sophie:
“Are you still married to him?”
Natalie answered:
“Yes.”
At that time.
That made Sophie uncomfortable.
Claire changed subject.
Children should not decide marriages.
Then Travis learned Natalie apologized.
He called it:
“betrayal.”
Natalie said:
“It wasn't about you.”
“It was exactly about me.”
Then he punched? No physical violence, avoid new dramatic aggression. He slammed a cabinet? Could be property aggression. But user specified no injury in video, story can have restrained. Better not escalate to physical. He packed a bag and stayed at gym office for three nights.
They started couples counseling.
Why?
Natalie wanted:
see if marriage could survive without business alliance.
Travis attended twice.
On third session, therapist asked:
“Would you still respect Natalie if she gave Claire back the twelve percent?”
Travis answered:
“She isn't giving it back. It was ours.”
Natalie heard:
ours
more strongly than:
hers.
Then therapist asked:
“What if an independent court decides transaction conflicted?”
Travis said:
“Then the system is rigged.”
No room.
Then Natalie said:
“What do you want from my family?”
Travis answered:
“To stop pretending Claire deserves the same place as people who stayed.”
There.
Not money.
Hierarchy.
Natalie realized:
even if she healed with Claire,
Travis would experience it as loss.
That made marriage difficult.
Then one more issue.
Forge House relocation.
Travis wanted Natalie to invest:
$120,000 from her personal savings
into new facility.
Natalie refused until:
business valuation,
independent agreement.
Travis laughed:
“Now you're scared of paperwork?”
She answered:
“No.”
Then:
“I finally respect it.”
They separated four months later.
Not because:
Claire demanded.
Claire did not.
Natalie rented:
small townhouse.
Travis kept:
Forge House.
They had no children together, simplifying.
Divorce later:
standard asset division,
business valuation.
No financial destruction.
Travis retained majority ownership of Forge House after buying out Natalie’s minority stake.
Natalie received:
fair settlement.
They ended contact except:
financial closing.
Closed eventually.
Then Claire asked Natalie:
“Do you blame me?”
Natalie answered:
“For the audit?”
“No.”
Then:
“For making me see things before I was ready?”
Claire almost smiled.
“Maybe.”
That relationship remained complicated.
May you like
The business review exposed that Travis cared less about recovering legitimate emergency capital than about permanently outranking Claire inside the family, and Natalie eventually separated from him after realizing reconciliation with her sister would always feel like betrayal to her husband. Part 9 would turn back to Claire and reveal that she had seen evidence of her reduced ownership two years earlier—and deliberately chose not to investigate because confronting it would force her to face her own absence from the business.
---
