Chapter 8 - The Investigation Took Twelve Days to Break Gregory’s Story
Pierce Marine hired Kendall Frost, an outside forensic accountant and former corporate investigator.
Not military.
Not family.
Kendall started from zero.
Question:
Where was Resolute?
Evidence:
### 1. Delmar appraisal receipt
Gregory possessed compass:
after Warren’s death,
before reported disappearance.
Strong.
### 2. Credit-card payment
Gregory personally paid:
$275 appraisal fee.
No estate reimbursement request.
Why?
No explanation.
### 3. Storage records
A Fort Lauderdale self-storage facility showed Gregory renting:
small climate-controlled locker
two days after appraisal.
The account remained active seven months.
Gregory initially said:
boat electronics.
Locker records did not show contents.
But timeline fit.
### 4. Security camera outage
Not caused by Molly.
Vendor ticket showed:
scheduled network reboot.
The family could have confirmed this with one phone call.
Nobody did.
### 5. Study access
Molly:
42 minutes.
Gregory:
13.
But Gregory’s funeral folder contained documents printed:
earlier that day.
Nothing proved he retrieved them then.
His explanation had never been verified.
### 6. Navy cloth
Estate photograph taken immediately after Warren’s death showed:
two navy polishing cloths
beside Resolute.
After disappearance:
one.
The cloth from Gregory’s suitcase matched:
manufacturer and dimensions.
Not unique forensic proof.
Consistent.
### 7. Insurance email
Gregory wrote insurer:
My sister had exclusive unsupervised access during the relevant period.
False.
He himself had access afterward.
That wording mattered.
Then Kendall interviewed Gregory.
“Why did you say exclusive?”
“I meant practically exclusive.”
“No.”
Then:
“You entered afterward.”
“Yes.”
“Possessed the compass before the loss report.”
Silence.
Eventually:
admission.
Then Bellhaven connection.
Email between Gregory and outside director Henry Watts, written the morning after Molly’s suspension:
With finance noise out of the room, we can finally move Bellhaven.
Henry replied:
Don't call your sister noise.
That did not prove staged theft.
But motive.
Then another text to Ashlynn:
Mom finally sees Molly isn't built to lead this company.
Sent two days after suspension.
Ashlynn remembered reading it.
She had replied:
Let the process finish.
Good.
Then next line:
But yes, maybe this clears the fog.
There.
Ashlynn had been willing to see an unresolved accusation as:
leadership clarification.
Kendall asked her:
“Why did you never verify the camera outage?”
“I thought Molly's access knowledge mattered.”
“Why not Gregory’s?”
“He told me what he was doing.”
“Did Molly?”
“Yes.”
That was devastating.
Both explained.
Ashlynn trusted one.
Then:
“Why did you treat Molly's motive as stronger?”
Ashlynn listed:
collectibles,
company frustration.
Kendall asked:
“Did Gregory have motive?”
Ashlynn knew.
Leadership.
Bellhaven.
Father’s approval.
Sibling rivalry.
She had not written it.
Then company review findings.
Gregory intentionally removed Resolute.
Allowed suspicion to fall on Molly.
Made materially misleading statements to:
family,
board,
insurer.
Used the resulting suspension to advance:
leadership authority
and Bellhaven approval.
However:
no company funds stolen in connection with compass.
Insurance claim:
withdrawn before payment.
No insurance proceeds received.
Good.
Then Bellhaven investigation.
Did Gregory commit fraud in project?
No.
Bad judgment.
Aggressive assumptions.
Some emails minimized risk.
But contract legitimate.
No embezzlement.
Company loss:
business loss.
Important.
Then $82,000.
Company acknowledged:
funds came from Gregory and Ashlynn’s joint account.
Board ordered:
repayment.
No hidden millions.
Then Gregory’s status.
Board removed him as acting president.
Placed him on administrative leave.
Later:
employment termination for dishonesty and governance breaches connected to Resolute and undisclosed related-party funding.
He retained:
30% shareholder interest under estate documents.
Ownership is not job.
No magical confiscation.
His shares became:
passive.
Voting subject to ordinary shareholder rules.
Cynthia and outside directors took temporary management while recruiting.
Molly did not immediately return.
She said:
“I'm not stepping back into Dad's chair because Gregory fell out of it.”
Good.
Then Ashlynn expected relief.
Gregory exposed.
Molly cleared.
Money repaid.
But Kendall asked:
“Do you want our report to describe your timeline memo as good-faith investigative assistance?”
Ashlynn almost said yes.
Then stopped.
Because that wording would protect her too much.
She had to decide whether she wanted:
accuracy
or:
the nicest interpretation.
May you like
The independent review proved Gregory staged Resolute’s disappearance and used the resulting distrust to sideline Molly during the Bellhaven decision, while finding no stolen company money or insurance payout. Part 9 would force Ashlynn to decide how her own role should be recorded—and whether she was willing to correct the public certainty she once used against Molly.
---
