Chapter 5 - NAOMI’S SHELL COMPANY

KMR Holdings was created two weeks after Naomi married Kathleen.
Its address matched a mailbox store in Henderson, Nevada.
Bank account signatory: Naomi Pierce.
Secondary authorized user: Amanda Wellman. Mom denied.
Then signature card.
Amanda’s signature looked real. She stared.
“I don’t remember signing this.”
I laughed bitterly.
Interesting how people discover importance of consent when their own signature appears.
Then forensic review.
Signature likely authentic. Date:
Three years earlier.
Mom had attended a conference in Las Vegas with Naomi.
Then: “What did Naomi tell you?”
Amanda closed eyes.
“That it was a settlement vehicle.” For what?
To acquire Ross warrant claims.
Then: “Why use Kathleen’s initials?”
“She said it would keep negotiation discreet.” There.
Then KMR received $1.2 million from Wellman entities.
How much used for legitimate acquisition expenses? About $310,000. Rest transferred.
$400,000 to Naomi personally.
$220,000 to luxury apartment.
$150,000 to offshore? Better avoid too international complexity. To Nevada investment account.
Then $120,000 to Austin. What?
Austin stared when investigators asked.
He had received $120,000 from Naomi one year earlier labeled “wedding reserve.”
He thought it came from her own money. Used: Wedding deposit. Ring. Travel. Some debt.
My brother had funded his wedding partly with money siphoned from our mother’s shell vehicle.
Then: “Did Mom know?” No.
Mom looked genuinely shocked.
Then Naomi’s strategy appeared.
She targeted Ross through Kathleen.
When marriage failed, she used Amanda’s old warrant to build a second route.
Then met Austin—not random? How exactly?
She had been consulting for Amanda when she attended a charity gala where Austin was present.
Did Mom introduce?
She said no.
Naomi approached him herself.
Then their relationship gave Naomi leverage over Mom:
If Amanda stopped paying, Naomi could expose secret consulting arrangement to Austin.
If Austin questioned money, Naomi called it personal wealth.
If Monica resisted, frame her as jealous.
Then why marry Austin?
Potential access to Wellman family trust, emotional control, perhaps spousal influence over Amanda’s estate.
Then one email Naomi wrote to herself? Draft strategy memo. Could be.
“Marriage to A creates durable family position independent of Amanda.” There.
Then: “Was Austin a target?” Yes.
Then Kathleen said:
“She did same to me.” Love perhaps. Target too.
Then prosecutors charged Naomi with fraud, identity theft, conspiracy, theft, falsification.
She surrendered through attorney.
No dramatic chase.
Then first hearing.
Austin attended? Protective order meant not near Monica; separate seating maybe. I did not attend.
Then Naomi’s lawyer claimed she was victim of Amanda.
Amanda directed all.
Then Amanda claimed reverse.
Then documents showed both. Different acts.
Then my assault case.
Austin pleaded to felony menacing/reckless assault-related offense? Need realistic but fictional. He accepted a plea to aggravated menacing and attempted assault, probation plus anger intervention, no-contact for two years, firearm restrictions maybe. He had no prior record and cooperated. Good.
Amanda pleaded to misdemeanor battery for hair pulling and separate financial charges later.
Then Austin wrote.
“I brought a tire iron because I wanted you to feel as powerless as I felt after Naomi disappeared.”
Then: “That is not excuse.” Good.
Then: “I blamed you because she was easier to love than truth.”
That line hurt.
Then: “I am sorry.”
Then no request.
Then mom’s criminal financial case. Naomi’s too.
Then Kathleen’s civil marriage.
Court eventually dissolved/annulled? Her marriage to Naomi legally ended through divorce proceeding. Good.
Then Kathleen asked to meet me alone. We did.
She said: “I almost didn’t send certificate.” Why?
She feared being dragged into Ross lawsuit.
Then: “Why did?”
“Because Naomi was about to marry Austin while still married to me.”
Then: “And the warning note?” She said:
“If Austin marries her, your family loses more than wedding.”
Because she knew Naomi was using both family claims.
Then: “Why mention Kathleen name to Mom?”
I asked: “Did you know Mom knew you?” “No.”
Wait Mom didn't know Kathleen personally perhaps, but knew Naomi's first marriage? How?
Amanda had seen Naomi’s onboarding documents for consulting, which listed spouse Kathleen Ross. She knew.
Then: “She hired Naomi while Naomi was still married to you?” Yes.
Then: “Did she know marriage had not ended?”
She knew Naomi said “separated.”
Then Kathleen: “Your mom knew enough to ask.” There.
Then: “Did Naomi ever tell you she loved Austin?” Kathleen thought. “Yes.”
Then: “Did you believe?” “Yes.”
That made me sad for him.
Then: “She loved me too, once.” Maybe.
Then: “People can exploit someone they love.” Yes.
Then we laughed bitterly.
Then Ross Coastal settlement talks.
The forged warrant exercise would be rescinded.
Wellman Capital entitled? Underlying warrant maybe still valid? It had expired? Old warrant rights contested due extensions. Independent review found rights valid but exercise fraud tainted.
Could Wellman re-exercise with my genuine consent? Maybe.
Then everyone looked at me. Would I?
Financially, huge profit.
Ross Coastal offered buyout of warrant for $6 million to end dispute. Could accept.
Would that reward family history? Maybe not.
Independent valuation said warrant settlement fair given litigation risk. I asked:
“What happens if I refuse?” Litigation years.
Then: “Does Kathleen want company free?” Yes.
Then: “Does my trust owe beneficiaries maximizing value?”
I was beneficiary plus fiduciary with duties. Independent co-fiduciary helps. We negotiated.
Ross paid $7.2 million to buy out legacy warrant permanently.
No ownership transfer.
Wellman trust got fair settlement.
Ross regained certainty.
Then Kathleen: “Thank you.”
I said: “This is business settlement, not gift.” Good.
Then from proceeds, legal costs. Then beneficiaries.
Then audit found Dad’s original documents. One note:
“I regret ever taking this warrant. It ties our family’s future to another family’s distress.” There.
Dad had planned to sell rights years earlier.
Then: “Why didn’t he?”
Mom had convinced him value might increase. Again.
Then final line:
“If Monica ever controls this, she should prefer clean exit over cheap control.” I laughed.
Dad had been writing instructions again.
But this time, I had already chosen clean exit before reading. That mattered.
Then Naomi offered plea.
She would admit fraud and identity theft, repay assets, testify about Amanda and Vaughn.
In exchange, reduced sentence.
Then prosecutors accepted conditioned on full accounting.
Then her proffer produced one more surprise.
She claimed Amanda had not hired her first.
My father had. Impossible.
Dad died twelve years ago.
Naomi was younger but working intern? She would have been 19? Maybe.
Then Naomi said not herself. Her mother.
A woman named Evelyn Pierce had worked for Dad.
Naomi inherited files.
And one file contained a secret about Amanda’s ownership that even Amanda did not know.
The Wellman family trust itself might never have belonged entirely to David Wellman.
May you like
Someone else had a claim.
And Naomi had been using that secret as leverage from the beginning.